[Location: Location_Category='OCEAN', Location_Type='SOUTHERN OCEAN', Detailed_Location='Heard Island']
Heard Island Penguin Colonies, 1948-1980Entry ID: ASAC_1219_HIMI_Pen
Abstract: This dataset contains information on the distribution of Penguins and their breeding colonies on Heard Island, as of 1983. It forms Australia's contribution to the International Survey of Antarctic Seabirds (ISAS). The results are listed in the documentation. These include counts of chicks, adults and nests, as well as colony distribution maps. The Heard Island survey includes King Penguins, ... Gentoo Penguins, Macaroni Penguins, Rockhopper Penguins and Chinstrap Penguins. This dataset is a subsection of the whole dataset, which surveys the Australian Antarctic Territory, Heard, McDonald and Macquarie Islands.
Original data were taken from ANARE Research Notes 9.
Only data from the Heard and McDonald Islands are described in this metadata record.
Images of rough maps detailing the locations of each of the colonies are available for download from the url given below. Observation and count data have been incorporated into the Australian Antarctic Data Centre's Biodiversity Database.
The data are presented in the format of Croxall and Kirkwood (1979) as recommended by the Report of the Subcommittee on Bird Biology held in Pretoria. In the tables all counts are estimates of the number of breeding pairs except where otherwise indicated. The numerical estimates and counts are of three kinds, indicated by the coded N, C or A:
NESTS (N = count of NESTS or breeding/incubating pairs) The most accurate count of breeding pairs is that derived from a count of nests. This is usually carried out during incubation, but may also be made while chicks are still in the nest, before creches are formed. Such counts are only underestimates of breeding pairs by the number of breeding failures sustained between egg laying and the date of the count.
CHICKS (C = count of CHICKS)
Late in the breeding season the only counts possible are those of chicks. In general most pygosceild penguins raise one chick per pair per season, so a count of chicks gives a reasonable approximation of the original number of breeding pairs. However, season to season variation in breeding success can often be considerable. For example Yeates (1968) reports breeding success in Adélie Penguins at Cape Royds of twenty-six per cent, forty-seven per cent and sixty-eight per cent ever three seasons. Also, Macaroni Penguins only raise approximately 0.5 chicks per pair per season, so that chick counts of this species may be a considerable underestimate of the true breeding population.
ADULTS (A = count of ADULTS)
Many colony counts and estimates were expressed as total number of birds or adults. These figures are difficult to interpret as they depend on the time during the breeding season at which they were made. For some days prior to and until laying is finished, both birds of a pair will be present at the nest site while during incubation it is more likely that only one bird will be present. A further problem with counts of 'birds' is that they may include individuals who are not breeding and this gives an overestimate of the true breeding population. The counts of 'birds' or 'adults' which appear unqualified in log books have been divided by two to give an estimate of the number of breeding pairs. It must be stressed therefore that these counts are the least accurate.
The degree of accuracy of these counts is inevitably highly variable and it is often difficult to ascertain on what basis a figure was arrived at. For the present survey counts have been allocated to one of five degrees of accuracy.
1. Pairs/nests essentially individually counted. The count is probably accurate to better than + 5 per cent.
2. Numbers of pairs in a known area counted individually and knowing the total area of the colony, the overall total calculated. This technique is useful for very large colonies.
3. Accurate estimates; + 10-15 per cent accuracy.
4. Rough estimate; accurate to 25-50 per cent.
5. Guesstimate; to nearest order of magnitude.
Many references are in the form ANARE (Johnstone) or simply ANARE. These refer to unpublished reports extracted from ANARE station biology logs. Those in the form Budd (1961) refer to published records and are listed in the references at the end of this publication.
The locations of some colonies are indicated on maps. Place names that (as of 1983) have not yet been approved are shown in the tables and on the maps in parentheses, for example: (ROCKERY ISLAND).
(Click for Interactive Map)
This data set description is a member of a collection. The collection is described in
Start Date: 1948-01-01Stop Date: 1980-03-31
ISO Topic Category
Quality Complete, includes all known Heard Island data, up to 1983. This dataset is a collation of all published and unpublished data concerning the distribution and abundance of all penguin species breeding at Heard Island. It forms part of a complete dataset survey the Australian Antarctic Territory, Heard Island, McDonald Islands and Macquarie Island.
Access Constraints See the reference for details.
Images of the maps are available as a download at the url given below. Observation and count data have been incorporated into the Australian Antarctic Data Centre's Biodiversity Database.
Use Constraints This data set conforms to the PICCCBY Attribution License
Must be cited properly
Data Set Progress
Distribution Media: HTTP
Distribution Size: 166 KB
Distribution Format: jpg
Role: TECHNICAL CONTACT
Email: eric.woehler at gmail.com
Province or State: Tasmania
Postal Code: 7001
Budd, G.M. (1961), The biotopes of Emperor Penguin Rookeries., Emu, 61, 171-189
Croxall, J.P. and Kirkwood, E.D. (1979), The distribution of penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula and Islands of the Scotia Sea, British Antarctic Survey: Cambridge
Horne, R (1983), The distribution of penguin breeding colonies on the Australian Antarctic Territory, Heard Island, the McDonald Islands, and Macquarie Island, ANARE research notes
Creation and Review Dates
DIF Creation Date: 1999-10-07
Last DIF Revision Date: 2011-05-10
Future DIF Review Date: 1999-10-07