Differences in Prevalence of Obesity Among Black, White, and Hispanic Adults --- United States, 2006-2008Entry ID: OBE-BWH06-08
Abstract: During 2006−2008, the age-adjusted estimated prevalence of obesity overall was 25.6% among non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics. Non-Hispanic blacks had the greatest prevalence of obesity (35.7%), followed by Hispanics (28.7%), and non-Hispanic whites (23.7%) (Table 1). These differences were consistent across all census regions and greater among women than men. Non-Hispanic black women had the greatest prevalence (39.2%), followed by non-Hispanic black men (31.6%), Hispanic women (29.4%), Hispanic men (27.8%), non-Hispanic white men (25.4%), and non-Hispanic white women (21.8%)
Purpose: Obesity is associated with increased health-care costs, reduced quality of life, and increased risk for premature death (1,2). Common morbidities associated with obesity include coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer (1,2). As of 2007, no state had met the Healthy People 2010 objective to reduce to 15% the prevalence of obesity among U.S. ... adults (3,4). An overarching goal of Healthy People 2010 is to eliminate health disparities among racial/ethnic populations. To assess differences in prevalence of obesity among non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics, CDC analyzed data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys conducted during 2006--2008. Overall, for the 3-year period, 25.6% of non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics were obese. Non-Hispanic blacks (35.7%) had 51% greater prevalence of obesity, and Hispanics (28.7%) had 21% greater prevalence, when compared with non-Hispanic whites (23.7%). This pattern was consistent across most U.S. states. However, state prevalences varied substantially, ranging from 23.0% (New Hampshire) to 45.1% (Maine) for non-Hispanic blacks, from 21.0% (Maryland) to 36.7% (Tennessee) for Hispanics, and from 9.0% (District of Columbia [DC]) to 30.2% (West Virginia) for non-Hispanic whites. Given the overall high prevalence of obesity and the significant differences among non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics, effective policies and environmental strategies that promote healthy eating and physical activity are needed for all populations and geographic areas, but particularly for those populations and areas disproportionally affected by obesity.
Data Set Citation
Dataset Originator/Creator: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Dataset Title: Differences in Prevalence of Obesity Among Black, White, and Hispanic Adults --- United States, 2006--2008
Dataset Release Date: July 17, 2009
Dataset Publisher: Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report
Version: Vol. 58Online Resource: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5827a2.htm
ISO Topic Category
Quality The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, the respondent heights and weights used to calculate BMI were self-reported. The prevalences of obesity reported in this study likely are underestimated because height commonly is overreported and weight underreported (10). Second, BRFSS excludes persons without landline telephones. Evidence shows that adults living in wireless-only households tend to be younger, to have lower incomes, and to be members of minority populations,†† which might result in either underestimates or overestimates. Third, because of limited numbers of non-Hispanic black respondents in five states, valid estimates for that population could not be calculated for those states.
Role: TECHNICAL CONTACT
Phone: (404) 498-1150
Fax: (404) 498-2389
Email: mmwrq at cdc.gov
1600 Clifton Rd., MS E-90
Province or State: Georgia
Postal Code: 30333
Country: United States
Role: DIF AUTHOR
Email: gsfc-gcmduso at mail.nasa.gov
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical guideline on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_gdlns.htm.
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's call to action to prevent and decrease obesity. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001. Available at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/CalltoAct....
US Department of Health and Human Services. Objective 19-2: reduce the proportion of adults who are obese. Healthy people 2010 (conference ed, in 2 vols). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Available at http://healthypeople.gov/document/html/objectives/19-02.htm.
CDC. State-specific prevalence of obesity among adults---United States, 2007. MMWR 2008;57:765--8.
Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States---gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev 2007;29:6--28.
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999--2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549--55.
CDC. Prevalence of fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity by race/ethnicity---United States, 2005. MMWR 2007;56:301--4.
Millstein RA, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, et al. Relationships between body satisfaction and weight control practices among US adults. Medscape J Med 2008;10:119.
Adler NE, Stewart J. Reducing obesity: motivating action while not blaming the victim. Milbank Q 2009;87:49--70.
Stewart AW, Jackson RT, Ford MA, Beaglehole R. Underestimation of relative weight by use of self-reported height and weight. Am J Epidemiol 1987;125:122--6.
Extended Metadata Properties
(Click to view more)
Creation and Review Dates
DIF Creation Date: 2011-06-29
Last DIF Revision Date: 2016-01-27