Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML) Archive of Project DocumentationEntry ID: CAML_Project_Archive.Progress_Updates
Abstract: In response to the need for incorporating quantified and spatially explicit measures of social values into ecosystem services assessments, the Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center (RMGSC), in collaboration with Colorado State University, developed a geographic information system (GIS) application, Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES). With version 2.0 (SolVES 2.0), RMGSC has improved ... and extended the functionality of SolVES, which was designed to assess, map, and quantify the perceived social values of ecosystem services. Social values such as aesthetics, biodiversity, and recreation can be evaluated for various stakeholder groups as distinguished by their attitudes and preferences regarding public uses, such as motorized recreation and logging. As with the previous version, SolVES 2.0 derives a quantitative, 10-point, social-values metric, the Value Index, from a combination of spatial and nonspatial responses to public attitude and preference surveys and calculates metrics characterizing the underlying environment, such as average distance to water and dominant landcover. Additionally, SolVES 2.0 integrates Maxent maximum entropy modeling software to generate more complete social value maps and to produce robust statistical models describing the relationship between the social values maps and explanatory environmental variables. The performance of these models can be evaluated for a primary study area, as well as for similar areas where primary survey data are not available but where social value mapping could potentially be completed using value-transfer methodology. SolVES 2.0 also introduces the flexibility for users to define their own social values and public uses, model any number and type of environmental variable, and modify the spatial resolution of analysis. With these enhancements, SolVES 2.0 provides an improved public domain tool for decisionmakers and researchers to evaluate the social values of ecosystem services and to facilitate discussions among diverse stakeholders regarding the tradeoffs among different ecosystem services in a variety of physical and social contexts ranging from forest and rangeland to coastal and marine.
[Summary provided by the USGS.]
ISO Topic Category
Distribution Media: Online
Distribution Size: 51 MB
Fees: No fees
Role: TECHNICAL CONTACT
Email: tpdinardo at usgs.gov
Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center P.O. Box 25046, MS-516
Province or State: CO
Postal Code: 80225-0046
Role: TECHNICAL CONTACT
Box 25046, Mail Stop 516
Province or State: CO
Postal Code: 80225
Role: SERF AUTHOR
Phone: (301) 614-6898
Email: Tyler.B.Stevens at nasa.gov
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Global Change Master Directory
Province or State: MD
Postal Code: 20771
Alessa, L.N., Kliskey, A.A., and Brown, G., 2008, Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space: Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 85, p. 27-39.
Brown, G., 2005, Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications: Society and Natural Resources, v. 18, p. 17-39.
Brown, G., and Alessa, L., 2005, A GIS-based inductive study of wilderness values: International Journal of Wilderness, v. 11, no. 1, p. 14-18.
Brown, G., and Reed, P., 2000, Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning: Forest Science, v. 46, no. 2, p. 240-247.
Brown, G.G., Reed, P., and Harris, C.C., 2002, Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study: Applied Geography, v. 22, p. 49-76.
Brown, G., Smith, C., Alessa, L., and Kliskey, A., 2004, A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance: Applied Geography, v. 24, p. 161-180.
Clement, J.M., 2006, Spatially explicit values on the Pike and San Isabel National Forests in Colorado: Fort Collins, Colorado State University, Ph.D. dissertation, ProQuest/UMI, AAT 3246268.
Clement, J.M., and Cheng, A.S., 2006, Public values and preferences regarding forest uses and management on the Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Colorado, Survey results: Fort Collins, Colorado State University, Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital: Nature, v. 387, p. 253-260.
Cowling, R.M., Egoh, B., Knight, A.T., O’Farrell, P.J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D.J., Welz, A., and Wilhelm-Rechman, A., 2008, An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation: PNAS, v. 105, no. 28, p. 9483-9488.
Daily, G.C., 1997, Introduction: what are ecosystem services?, in Daily, G.C., ed., Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems: Washington, D.C., Island Press, p. 1-10.
Kumar, M., and Kumar, P., 2008, Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective: Ecological Economics, v. 64, p. 808-819.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003, Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment: Washington, D.C., Island Press, 245 p.
Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G., and Nunes, P.A.L.D., 2008, Economic valuation of biodiveristy: a comparative study: Ecological Economics, v. 67, p. 217-231.
Reed, P., and Brown, G., 2003, Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v. 46, no. 5, p. 643-658.
Silverman, B.W., 1986, Density estimation for atatistics and data analysis: New York, Chapman and Hall, 176 p.
Troy, A., and Wilson, M.A., 2006, Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer: Ecological Economics, v. 60, p. 435-449.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2008, Counting all that matters: recognizing the value of ecosystem services: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW Science Update 16, 11 p.
Watts, R.D., Compton, R.W., McCammon, J.H., Rich, C.L., Wright, S.M., Owens, T., and Ouren, D.S., 2007, Roadless space of the conterminous United States: Science, v. 316, p. 736-738.
Creation and Review Dates